Case Studies and Cost-Benefit Analysis as Applied to the Kellogg Youth Initiatives Program

KCollege.Access.ContactIf you are not a current Kalamazoo College student, faculty, or staff member, email dspace@kzoo.edu to request access to this thesis.
dc.contributor.advisorMcKinney, Hannah J., 1955- (see also Hiles, Hannah J., 1955- and Apps, Hannah J., 1955-)
dc.contributor.authorSchreur, Sandra G.
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-27T18:29:27Z
dc.date.available2012-04-27T18:29:27Z
dc.date.issued1992
dc.description88 p.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe following paper is a study of the evaluation processes of the Kellogg Foundation's Youth Initiatives Program. This Senior Individualized Project (SIP) compares cost-benefit analysis to the more qualitative evaluation currently used by the Kellogg Foundation. Cost-benefit analysis is a traditional evaluation process used by economists. It is designed to compare projects quantitatively. Case studies, which are an evaluation process used by the Kellogg Foundation, look qualitatively at projects in depth without comparing projects. After studying both methods of project evaluation, this SIP concludes that both types of evaluation have limitations, which arise because these evaluation processes seek to measure the immeasurable. Until evaluation processes emerge that can measure changes in the non-quantifiable, organizations will continue to waste their finite resources.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10920/25836
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofKalamazoo College Economics and Business Senior Individualized Projects Collection
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSenior Individualized Projects. Economics and Business.;
dc.rightsU.S. copyright laws protect this material. Commercial use or distribution of this material is not permitted without prior written permission of the copyright holder.
dc.titleCase Studies and Cost-Benefit Analysis as Applied to the Kellogg Youth Initiatives Programen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Files