Is Jazz Dead? ( or has it changed its dress)
Loading...
Authors
Felber, Garrett
Issue Date
2007
Type
Thesis
Language
en_US
Keywords
Alternative Title
Abstract
In this essay, I will first historicize jazz within a paradoxical American identity
which sees itself embodied by both a broad common culture and fierce individualism.
Jazz, as a participant in this paradox, is described in similar contradictory terms: its
combination of African and European elements, relationship to both art and popular
culture, and as a symbol of both working class and high-brow culture. The notion of
racial appropriation, which has long been a profound problem in jazz, will be integral to
my argument for the place of jazz in America. Jazz was born out of and has matured
through the convergence of European and African cultures in the unique displacement of
America, and there is something embedded within the music that continues to thrive in its
endemic environment. J.A. Rogers, in his essay "Jazz at Home," wrote that it is "difficult
to say whether jazz is more characteristic of the Negro or of contemporary America. As
was shown, it is of Negro origin plus the influence of the American environment. It is
Negro-American ... [a] product of the peculiar and unique experience of the Negro in
this country." This sentiment, although half a century old in Rogers' case, is still echoed
in contemporary jazz circles. When asked if he saw any potential problems with Europe
becoming the new center of jazz, pianist Matthew Shipp replied, "This will never happen
for the mythic power of the idea of black Americans creating an alternative language out
of the hellhole of the American experience is such a strong and empowering idea that it
will trump every idea of the perception of jazz's new center being Europe ... take my
word on this." Finally, after outlining the problems of American jazz, most of which lie
in Marsalis' triumvirate of self-proclaimed messiahs, I will delve into a music scene
which has been neglected by the larger scope of jazz and proves a vibrant American jazz
which neither necessitates nor begs transplantation to European soil.
My intent through this writing is in no way to disparage or discredit European
artists. Rather, my concern is that a shift to Europe may act as a final symbolic
cementation of the classicizing, canonizing, and white-washing of jazz which has led it to
its current state. Finally, this is a call to American musicians, listeners, and critics to look
past the rigid prototype which has been put forth, towards contemporary music which is
both in conversation with the jazz of old and pushing forward the voices of new.
Nicholson concludes a synopsis of the jazz mainstream by claiming, "If art is meant to be
a reflection of life, then in America, by instinct a conservative nation, the main area of
jazz activity had become conservative because there was a growing realization there was
much to conserve. However, his mistake is not in a critique of contemporary American
jazz, but rather, in the semantics of art, for art is not meant to be a passive reflection of
culture, but rather an upsetting of the status quo, a dissection, and a radical response to
the culture it inhabits. If America is as Nicholson sees, an instinctively conservative
nation, then perhaps it needs jazz more than ever.
Description
i, 54 p.
Citation
Publisher
License
U.S. copyright laws protect this material. Commercial use or distribution of this material is not permitted without prior written permission of the copyright holder. All rights reserved.