Auditory Disfluency Disrupts the Confirmation Bias

dc.contributor.authorKristal, Emma M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-08T13:04:12Z
dc.date.available2022-04-08T13:04:12Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description1 Broadside. 48"W x 36"Hen_US
dc.description.abstractThe current study examined whether two different types of auditory disfluency could result in diminished bias amongst juror verdicts in a mock trial. In Experiment 1, acting as jurors, participants read either a positive or negative description of the defendant. Participants then either read or listened to the stipulated facts, presented in either a fluent or disfluent format. After reading or listening to the stipulated facts, participants decided if the defendant was guilty or not guilty. In Experiment 2, a novel auditory disfluency design was used. In both experiments, participants who were given the stipulated facts in a disfluent format were less likely to show a confirmatory pattern in reported verdicts for the defendant.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipKalamazoo College. Department of Biology. Diebold Symposium, 2018en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://cache.kzoo.edu/handle/10920/43378
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKalamazoo, Mich. : Kalamazoo Collegeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofKalamazoo College Diebold Symposium Presentation Collectionen
dc.rightsU.S. copyright laws protect this material. Commercial use or distribution of this material is not permitted without prior written permission of the copyright holder.en
dc.titleAuditory Disfluency Disrupts the Confirmation Biasen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
Files