A Comparison of Two "New Math" Geometry Texts and the Historical Development of their Foundations

dc.contributor.advisorCalloway, Jean M., 1923-2019
dc.contributor.authorScribner, Charles William
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-14T14:39:26Z
dc.date.available2011-03-14T14:39:26Z
dc.date.issued1967
dc.descriptioniv, 56 p.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe two "new math" texts which I am comparing in this paper are, The School Mathematics study Group (SMSG) high school geometry text, and the Ball State geometry text. I should qualify the use of "comparing", for I am concerned mainly with the foundations of the modern texts, their historical bases, and the order of presentation of materials. I do not intend, to make judgments on the more educational aspect of which text has better introductions, better summaries or review exercises. On the other hand, I have tried to examine quite thoroughly the postulational foundations of these two texts and their h1storical development.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10920/20603
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKalamazoo Collegeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofKalamazoo College Mathematics Senior Individualized Projects Collection
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSenior Individualized Projects. Mathematics.;
dc.rightsU.S. copyright laws protect this material. Commercial use or distribution of this material is not permitted without prior written permission of the copyright holder.
dc.titleA Comparison of Two "New Math" Geometry Texts and the Historical Development of their Foundationsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Files