JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
  • About K
  • Academics
  • Admission
  • Alumni Relations
  • Giving to K
  • News & Events
  • Student Life
  • HORNET HIVE
  • ATHLETICS
  • SITEMAP
  • WEBMAIL
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   CACHE Homepage
    • Academic Departments, Programs, and SIPs
    • Biology
    • Biology Senior Integrated Projects
    • View Item
    •   CACHE Homepage
    • Academic Departments, Programs, and SIPs
    • Biology
    • Biology Senior Integrated Projects
    • View Item

    The Effects of Constant and Fluctuating Thermal Environments on Life History Traits of the Fathead Minnow, Pimephales promelas

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Searchable PDF/Kalamazoo College Only (2.133Mb)
    Date
    2018
    Author
    Irvine, Shannon E.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Climate change can impact the life history of organisms through elevating temperatures And the increasing intensity of daily fluctuations. Most experiments addressing the effects of climate change do so with constant temperature treatments. However, the use of constant temperatures as opposed to fluctuating temperatures in an experiment can greatly affect the trait under observation, as fluctuating conditions have been shown to produce different results. In order to determine the effects of constant versus fluctuating temperature environments on fish, as well as to determine the validity of a growth-measuring technique called growing degree days, I raised fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, in four fluctuating and four constant temperature regimes. I found that paired constant and fluctuating treatments that shared similar degree days showed no difference in growth at the lower temperatures but did at higher, more stressful temperatures. Conversely, the paired treatments reared at higher temperatures showed no difference in critical thermal maximum (CTmax), the temperature at which the fish lose control of motor functions. For the temperature pairings at lower temperatures, however, the fluctuating treatments demonstrated a significantly higher CTmax than the constant treatments. Therefore, in the context of climate change experiments two conclusions were drawn: primarily, the use of growing degree days (GDD) to measure environments with varying levels of environmental fluctuations should be done with caution. Secondly, extreme fluctuating and constant temperature environments do indeed produce different growth results, and further research should be carried out to determine the severity of these differences.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10920/36032
    Collections
    • Biology Senior Integrated Projects [1649]

    Browse

    All of CACHECommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2023  DuraSpace
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
    Logo

    Kalamazoo College
    1200 Academy Street
    Kalamazoo Michigan 49006-3295
    USA
    Info 269-337-7000
    Admission 1-800-253-3602

    About K
    Academics
    Admission
    Alumni Relations
    Giving to K
    News & Events
    Student Life
    Sitemap
    Map & Directions
    Contacts
    Directories
    Nondiscrimination Policy
    Consumer Information
    Official disclaimer
    Search this site


    Academic Calendars
    Apply
    Bookstore
    Crisis Response
    Employment
    Library
    Registrar
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV