Who Pays: A Comparative Analysis of Monetary Legal Settlement Cases of Police Brutality

dc.contributor.author	Lee, Bo Gyoung
dc.date.accessioned	2017-01-19T17:24:02Z
dc.date.available	2017-01-19T17:24:02Z
dc.date.issued	2016
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10920/30606
dc.description.abstract	Using a comparative analysis between the United States and South Korea, this paper attempts to analyze the police brutality as a market failure caused by principal-agent problem and asymmetric information. For the qualitative part of the research, court cases are analyzed to corroborate the hypothesis that the market failures in two countries are drawn from a combination of disparity in informal social control and the principal-agent problem. The fixed-effects regression was run against the monetary settlement cases to test the hypothesis.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.title	Who Pays: A Comparative Analysis of Monetary Legal Settlement Cases of Police Brutality	en_US
dc.type	Presentation	en_US

Economics and Business Symposium Posters [61]
Poster presentations by senior Economics and Business majors that include the results of their Senior Individualized Projects (SIPs) at the Diebold Symposium. Abstracts are generally available to the public, but PDF files are available only to current Kalamazoo College students, faculty, and staff.