JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
  • About K
  • Academics
  • Admission
  • Alumni Relations
  • Giving to K
  • News & Events
  • Student Life
  • HORNET HIVE
  • ATHLETICS
  • SITEMAP
  • WEBMAIL
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   CACHE Homepage
    • Academic Departments, Programs, and SIPs
    • Religion
    • Religion Senior Integrated Projects
    • View Item
    •   CACHE Homepage
    • Academic Departments, Programs, and SIPs
    • Religion
    • Religion Senior Integrated Projects
    • View Item

    An Empire of Opression : Roman Use of Conquered Religions

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Searchable PDF / Kalamazoo College Only (2.915Mb)
    Date
    2016
    Author
    Lane, Robyn
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Religious syncretism was as common as war and imperialist expansion in the classical period. Greece started, providing an example of syncretism as part of political maneuvers, especially in Egypt. They would make other gods Greek in appearance and bring them into the accepted Greek pantheon. The Romans followed this example when entering Egypt, and took on the Egyptian deities, though they used the Hellenized versions of them most often. The Romans already were adopting foreign deities and turning their cults into Roman cults, as seen with Mithras. A very large question that this raises is why they chose these specific deities to worship and give importance to and not others. There were many gods in the pre-Zoroastrian Persian pantheon, yet the Romans only took Mithra. There were many gods in Egypt that had been Hellenized and used by the Greeks, yet the Romans only made the cult of Isis and Serapis so important. The question is: why these gods specifically? Why not others? What made these specific gods so special to the Romans that they were given this honor, to become Roman gods? The rejection of the Israelite god is not so much of a mystery, coming from a monotheistic religion. There was only one to accept or reject, not a group to choose from. However, there still are more subtle details that led to the treatment of each god that must be explored to fully understand the Roman reactions. There are no direct answers to exactly why each god was treated in the way that they were, because every decision is full of intricate and delicate human desires. With no black-and-white definitions in early religions, there was a lot of room for gray areas to take over and allow human decisions to shape history. So now, why exactly did Mithra become Mithras, Isis become one of the most beloved deities in the Empire and the Israelite God become a reason for the deaths of thousands? What shaped these interactions in such a way that the outcomes varied so vastly?
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10920/30520
    Collections
    • Religion Senior Integrated Projects [175]

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2022  DuraSpace
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
    Logo

    Kalamazoo College
    1200 Academy Street
    Kalamazoo Michigan 49006-3295
    USA
    Info 269-337-7000
    Admission 1-800-253-3602

    About K
    Academics
    Admission
    Alumni Relations
    Giving to K
    News & Events
    Student Life
    Sitemap
    Map & Directions
    Contacts
    Directories
    Nondiscrimination Policy
    Consumer Information
    Official disclaimer
    Search this site


    Academic Calendars
    Apply
    Bookstore
    Crisis Response
    Employment
    Library
    Registrar
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV