dc.contributor.advisor | Griffin, Gail B., 1950- | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Hannah, Eleanor L., 1965- | |
dc.contributor.author | Cromer, Sharalynn Denae | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-09-24T14:58:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-09-24T14:58:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1998 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10920/29007 | |
dc.description | ii, 56 p. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This essay was written with the intention of exploring both
personally and critically the growing dialogue among academic
feminists and historians in regard to post-structuralism. What are the
consequences of adopting gender- and literary-theory for methods of
historical inquiry? Having been interested in the subject of female
hysteria in Victorian America, I used this subject as a case study.
This, I hope, will test claims made in the first thirty pages and
also provide a concrete example from the past on which a
historiography can be built and examined. I see this project not as
my definitive statement on the subject but instead as a beginning. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.title | Interrogating the Postmodern: Feminist History after the Linguistic Turn | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |