dc.contributor.advisor | Cummings, C. Kim (Charles Kim), 1940- | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Bunderson, J. Stuart | |
dc.contributor.author | Bolla, Cori | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-27T17:50:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-27T17:50:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10920/27458 | |
dc.description | iii, 34 p. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Contracts exist everywhere in the world. They are by no means exclusive to
organizations. For example, when you borrow $5 from a friend and make a promise to
pay her back in a week, there is a verbal contract between the two of you. However, the
most common types of contracts that people think of are those in organizations. I
casually asked a friend what comes to mind when she hears the word "contract" and she
replied, "a signed, legally-binding bit of paper between two people". This is a typical
response that most people would give. However, contracts are much more than that.
Contracts can take on many different forms. In fact, they do not necessarily even
have to be written contracts. Many forms of contracts in organizations today are not
"legally-binding bits of paper" and recently much attention has been given to them. The
contracts being referred to are called psychological contracts. Despite the countless
research papers, seminar discussions and conference speeches on them, the question still
remains: What exactly is the psychological contract?
A psychological contract can be thought of as an employee's take on the
unwritten promises and agreements implicit in his or her relationship with their employer.
The old contract guaranteed an employee a ')ob for life"; while the new psychological
contract promises an employee they will be "employable for life".
Psychological contracts not only differ from organization to organization, but also
from person to person. However, it is important to point out that in most organizations
employees share very similar psychological contracts with one another as a result of the
organizational culture being projected onto them.
Although much information exists on psychological contracts, few researchers
have applied this information directly to organizations. To fill this void, we interviewed
employees at the Cincinnati Zoo to determine how applicable psychological contract
theory really is to a real-world environment
To further explore how psychological contracts are formed and illustrate a new
emerging type of psychological contract that ·exists, the following information is given in
the paper: a brief overview of the history of contracts (specifically psychological
contracts and the different types of psychological contracts), a real-world application of
psychological contract theory on Cincinnati Zoo employees, conclusions made based
upon the interviews that involve ideology-based contracts, and suggestions for future
research to expand what already exits in existing literature on the study of psychological
contracts. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Olin School of Business. Washington University. St. Louis, Missouri. | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Kalamazoo, Mich. : Kalamazoo College. | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Kalamazoo College Anthropology and Sociology Senior Individualized Projects Collection | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Senior Individualized Projects. Anthropology and Sociology.; | |
dc.rights | U.S. copyright laws protect this material. Commercial use or distribution of this material is not permitted without prior written permission of the copyright holder. All rights reserved. | |
dc.title | Psychological Contracts: Understanding Ideological Exchange and Currencies through Semi-Structured Interviews with Cincinnati Zoo Employees | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
KCollege.Access.Contact | If you are not a current Kalamazoo College student, faculty, or staff member, email dspace@kzoo.edu to request access to this thesis. | |