Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBarraclough, Laura R., 1978-
dc.contributor.authorMason, Charles F.
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-16T18:17:19Z
dc.date.available2012-08-16T18:17:19Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10920/27315
dc.descriptionvi, 102 p.en_US
dc.description.abstractEuclidean zoning, the dominant form of American land use zoning, has functioned on the separation of land uses with the purpose of reducing the negative effects of certain types of uses on others. As a result, communities have come to define l~d uses by "desirability" and their effects in terms of "nuisances." For example, the creation of use districts separates noisy or polluting industrial and commercial uses are from residential areas. However, these notions are also used to define specific housing types as more desirable than others. This has led to the exclusion or segregation of different forms of housing from communities, resulting in disparities. Researchers have argued that socioeconomic segregation has resulted primarily from zoning being used as a property rights measure to maintain land values. Research has also shown that Euclidean zoning has perpetuated specific economic and social notions that have only served to widen inequalities. Most existing research, however, has focused on the effects of Euclidean zoning, rather than the processes that result in those effects. Using interviews with public officials, administrators, and professionals, in combination with theories of Foucault, Gramsci, Massey, Hall and McGinty, and Form, among others, I show that zoning enables power to organize land uses for the ends of the planned economy. I argue that if communities seek to lessen socioeconomic segregation, they must redefine conventional zoning. This will not result in a redefinition of the "ends" of zoning, but rather a complete reorientation of assumptions about how zoning works to achieve those ends.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKalamazoo, Mich. : Kalamazoo College.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofKalamazoo College Anthropology and Sociology Senior Individualized Projects Collection
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSenior Individualized Projects. Anthropology and Sociology.;
dc.rightsU.S. copyright laws protect this material. Commercial use or distribution of this material is not permitted without prior written permission of the copyright holder. All rights reserved.
dc.titleEcomonic Practice, Social Consequence Motivations and Methods of Zoning in American Communitiesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
KCollege.Access.ContactIf you are not a current Kalamazoo College student, faculty, or staff member, email dspace@kzoo.edu to request access to this thesis.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Anthropology and Sociology Senior Individualized Projects [658]
    This collection includes Senior Integrated Projects (SIP's) completed in the Anthropology and Sociology Department. Abstracts are generally available to the public, but PDF files are available only to current Kalamazoo College students, faculty, and staff.

Show simple item record