ABOUT K
ACADEMICS
ADMISSION
ALUMNI RELATIONS
GIVING TO K
NEWS & EVENTS
STUDENT LIFE
HORNET HIVE
ATHLETICS
SITEMAP
WEBMAIL
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • Academic Departments, Programs, and SIPs
    • Economics and Business
    • Economics and Business Senior Individualized Projects
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • Academic Departments, Programs, and SIPs
    • Economics and Business
    • Economics and Business Senior Individualized Projects
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The RIAA: Mistakes of the Past, Opportunities for the Future

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Jeff-GilsonSIP.pdf (2.289Mb)
    Date
    2008
    Author
    Gilson, Jeff
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The invention of digital files revolutionized the entertainment industry, drastically increasing the portability of music and movies and leading to new industries like video games. But this new invention, like many before it, was met with a type of laissez faire attitude as the regulatory organizations were unprepared for its implications. The United States and international organizations were slow to set out formal rules for this new wave of technology, which left companies and consumers fighting a sort of digital "is/ought" problem. The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) took the lead in the battle against the copyright infringement that this new technology spurred by "suing the technology", or more accurately, suing those who made it available. They had early legal success against Napster, but new services were designed to limit responsibility and deflect criticism. After all, the services themselves were not illegal, and many used them for legal file-sharing. As the RIAA lost some of their lawsuits against the post-Napster services, they moved from suing the technology to suing the providers- or the Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to be specific. This second phase of their plan was limited, as the ISPs were also large and powerful corporations. Instead, the RIAA sued them as a springboard for their third step, which was a campaign to sue the consumers directly. Much criticism developed from the RIAA's campaign to target the consumers, the same consumers they wanted to buy their product. Isolated stories of lawsuits against children, the disabled, and even deceased people shifted public opinion against the organization. Their strategy of mass litigation was labeled "spamigation" and some defendants filed and won countersuits against the RIAA. Others argued that if the record industry truly cared about curtailing illegal downloading they would put more effort into a competent legal alternative for downloading music. It finally took a company outside of the RIAA to offer this alternative, and the iTunes Music Store slowly picked up momentum to achieve the 70% market share in online music it has today. The RIAA does not seem to have a solid foundation in economics. They have tried to convince people that CDs are underpriced based on the Consumer Price Index, don't seem to understand the opportunity that an infinite good presents, and have tried to reframe the piracy debate to "we can't compete with free." They even sued a Russian company for more than the entire GDP of the country. Worst of all, the organization hasn't given a cent of the millions of dollars in winnings from their lawsuits to the artists they are acting on the behalf of. The music industry should try to work with developing technology like Peer-to-Peer services. They can do this by organizing a voluntary collective licensing scheme where users pay a small monthly fee to continue doing what they clearly are going to do anyway (i.e. use p2p . services). The money would then be divided between artists based on the popularity of their songs, allowing them to easily reach a wider audience. If they so choose the music industry can combine this plan with ad-sharing or a media tariff, but the core of their plan needs to include p2p technology. Once instituted, the RIAA would have much less people to file lawsuits against and would not be so loathed publicly. Adoption rates for p2p technology continue to rise, and the RIAA needs to embrace the new technology rather than trying to fight it.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10920/26297
    Collections
    • Economics and Business Senior Individualized Projects [1081]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitles

    My Account

    Login

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    K logo
    Kalamazoo College
    1200 Academy Street
    Kalamazoo Michigan 49006-3295
    USA
    Info 269-337-7000
    Admission 1-800-253-3602
    ABOUT K
    ACADEMICS
    ADMISSION
    ALUMNI RELATIONS
    GIVING TO K
    NEWS & EVENTS
    STUDENT LIFE

    Sitemap
    Map and Directions
    Contacts
    Directories
    Nondiscrimination Policy
    Consumer Information
    Official Disclaimer
    Search this site





    Academic Calendars
    Apply
    Bookstore
    Crisis Response
    Employment
    Library
    Registrar