Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLatiolais, Christopher, 1957-
dc.contributor.authorWeber, John M.
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-02T15:14:05Z
dc.date.available2011-05-02T15:14:05Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10920/21539
dc.description68 p.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn Ecrits, Lacan often characterizes Frued’s work as posing, the question, what is a father? The question ought not to be interpreted as some question of gender roles and norms, rather, it address the very operations of language. Pyschoanalysis must then be radically opposed to pyschology. While psychology studies behavior, it is psychoanalysis that structures its discourse such that the intrusion of the signifier into the human being is taken into account. At the level of the signifier, we find the very conditions for subjectivity. The Name-of-the-Father, as I shall show, is not the identification of the behavior of a father, but the installation of signification, the first mark scrawled in the sand. This project is then a philosophical pillaging of psychoanalytic discourse. I act as one of Nietzche’s bad readers that take only what they need. Writing as a philosopher rather than an analyst, I “borrow” from psychoanalysis a conception of the “Copernican turn” toward Otherness, the notion that the human being is alienated from their own being, and a thesi on desire, language, and their conjuction in the unconscious. Lacan’s formulaiton, “the unconscious is the discourse of the Other,” I understand as the absolute mediation of subjectivity through symbolically achieved recognition. However, I contrast the transparency of a Habersian understanding of recognitive sociality with the “structure of misrecognition” that constitues the locus of the Other. My philosophical tack is then a reworking, through a fair amount of existentialism, of the classic postmodern critique of modernity. I level technocratic discourse agianst the ideals of autonomous reason and search for a way to account for a subject that is niether an ideal rational agent nor a strictly embodied being-in-the-world, but a subject that lives out his or her splitting in language.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofKalamazoo College Philosophy Senior Individualized Projects Collection
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSenior Individualized Projects. Philosophy.;
dc.rightsU.S. copyright laws protect this material. Commercial use or distribution of this material is not permitted without prior written permission of the copyright holder. All rights reserved.
dc.titleNames-of-the-Father: Zizek’s Return to Lacan’s Return to Freuden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Philosophy Senior Individualized Projects [164]
    This collection includes Senior Individualized Projects (SIP's) completed in the Philosophy Department. Abstracts are generally available to the public, but PDF files are available only to current Kalamazoo College students, faculty, and staff.

Show simple item record