Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMirza, David B.
dc.contributor.authorHarding, James Nicholas
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-28T12:30:23Z
dc.date.available2010-06-28T12:30:23Z
dc.date.issued1969
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10920/15858
dc.descriptionv, 85 p.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe quota program was originally enacted to protect the prorationing system and its dependent oil industry from cheaper foreign oil imports. This paper will review the conditions at its enactment and the goals aimed for; the actual results and effects from the quota will be critically examined also. The arguments for and against the quota will be evaluated. It will be shown that the oil import quota has no sound or justifiable economic reasons for being maintained. It will become evident that the reasons for the quota (and the prorationing system) are now nothing more than prof1ts for the oil industry, at the expense of the rest of the nation.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofKalamazoo College Economics and Business Senior Individualized Projects Collection
dc.rightsU.S. copyright laws protect this material. Commercial use or distribution of this material is not permitted without prior written permission of the copyright holder.
dc.titleA Critical Study of Two Aspects of the U.S. Crude Petroleum Industryen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Economics and Business Senior Individualized Projects [1120]
    This collection includes Senior Individualized Projects (SIP's) completed in the Economics and Business Department. Abstracts are generally available to the public, but PDF files are available only to current Kalamazoo College students, faculty, and staff.

Show simple item record