JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
  • About K
  • Academics
  • Admission
  • Alumni Relations
  • Giving to K
  • News & Events
  • Student Life
  • HORNET HIVE
  • ATHLETICS
  • SITEMAP
  • WEBMAIL
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   CACHE Homepage
    • Academic Departments, Programs, and SIPs
    • Political Science
    • Political Science Senior Integrated Projects
    • View Item
    •   CACHE Homepage
    • Academic Departments, Programs, and SIPs
    • Political Science
    • Political Science Senior Integrated Projects
    • View Item

    An Investigation Into a Revolution in Jurisprudence Enacted by the United States Supreme Court

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Searchable PDF/Kalamazoo College Only (2.594Mb)
    Date
    1994
    Author
    Kanaan, Khaled
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The Spirit of this treatise is to attain a better and more thorough understanding of the judicial revolution initiated by the Warren Court and its continuance into the early years of the Burger Court. Through the examination of some of these decisions it can clearly be shown the change in the Supreme Court's jurisprudence in the latter half of the twentieth century. Fairness became the law of the land and a break from precedent meant that activists controlled the destiny of the Court. Never before had this branch of government yielded its power to address problems in the formal sphere of American society. Before this period the Federal Judiciary had not carried its powers so far; however, Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), Baker v. Carr, 396 U.S. 186 (1962), and Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) exhibit a significant change of procedure, unprecedented in its history to address issues of such profound moral and social significance. During the era of the Warren Court and into the Courts beyond, a significant change in the Court occured. Here judicial techniques and reasoning coalesced to unknown standards. The Court during this era attempted to justify this by imposing political and moral uniformity across wide areas of American life. To better understand this change in the Court this paper will examine the issues that relate to federalism, jurisdiction, and controversy of these aforementioned cases. This analysis will provide incite into these Courts and allow reflection upon the dramtic revolution in Constitutional law. A better understanding of the occurences of this period will allow for a more adept study of the present Court. However before we set the stage, we will first review the history of the Court prior to this revolutionary era with an emphasis on the evolution of constitutional law and the emergence of a new jurisprudence held by the Supreme Court Justice.
     
    If you are not a current K College student, faculty, or staff member, email dspace@kzoo.edu to request access to this SIP.
     
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10920/14962
    Collections
    • Kalamazoo College Guilds: Justice and Peace SIPs [732]
    • Political Science Senior Integrated Projects [799]

    Browse

    All of CACHECommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2023  DuraSpace
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
    Logo

    Kalamazoo College
    1200 Academy Street
    Kalamazoo Michigan 49006-3295
    USA
    Info 269-337-7000
    Admission 1-800-253-3602

    About K
    Academics
    Admission
    Alumni Relations
    Giving to K
    News & Events
    Student Life
    Sitemap
    Map & Directions
    Contacts
    Directories
    Nondiscrimination Policy
    Consumer Information
    Official disclaimer
    Search this site


    Academic Calendars
    Apply
    Bookstore
    Crisis Response
    Employment
    Library
    Registrar
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV