Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorFilner, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Glenisha
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-11T17:22:12Z
dc.date.available2009-12-11T17:22:12Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10920/11709
dc.description50 p.
dc.description.abstractZucchino's motivation for writing the book was to discover if women on welfare were "worthy more of contempt or compassion, or something in between" (1997, 13). Like Zucchino, I too question whether women, specifically Black women, on welfare are deserving or not and trace one of the reasons they are considered "undeserving" to be linked with various stereotypes. My motivation for writing this paper is to explore the stereotypes historically associated with African-American women in welfare debates and the transition that has taken place with use of terms. Specifically, the focus is on African-American women who receive welfare being stereotyped as "welfare mothers" versus mothers on welfare, and how this stereotype has evolved into the term, "dependent mother." The distinction between the terms "welfare mother" and "mother on welfare" is that the term "welfare mother" labels a welfare recipient by their circumstance and devalues their identity as a mother as being different and inferior to other mothers due their receipt of assistance from the government. The term "welfare mother" gives the connotation that their interaction with the system, and not the degree of their commitment to their children, chiefly determines their parenting ability. The danger of using this type of terminology is that it ill-defines "good parenting" as being economically independent and not receiving financial assistance from the · government This invalidates the existence of a welfare state, which is to assist parents in providing for their families-not to ridicule them for needing assistance. Specifically, stereotypes of Black mothers on welfare are more likely to influence the welfare debate than those held of other groups. The National Race and Politics Study of 1991, found that beliefs about Black welfare mothers played a larger role in generating opposition to welfare spending than beliefs about White welfare mothers. Moreover, stereotypes about Black welfare recipients were almost twice as strong in predicting opposition to welfare as stereotypes of White mothers on welfare (Gilens 1999,98-99). Therefore, when tracing the evolution of stereotypes it important to keep in mind the "multiplier" effect that stereotypes of African-American recipients of welfare cast on the welfare debate.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofKalamazoo College Political Science Senior Individualized Projects Collection
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSenior Individualized Projects. Political Science.;
dc.rightsU.S. copyright laws protect this material. Commercial use or distribution of this material is not permitted without prior written permission of the copyright holder.
dc.titleOpting Out Without Disclosure: A Survey of How TANF Welfare Reform is Conducive to Perpetuating Prejudice of African-Americansen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Kalamazoo College Guilds: Justice and Peace SIPs [733]
    This collection includes Senior Individualized Projects (SIP's) that deal with issues of justice and peace. Abstracts are generally available to the public, but PDF files are available only to current Kalamazoo College students, faculty, and staff.
  • Political Science Senior Individualized Projects [769]
    This collection includes Senior Individualized Projects (SIP's) completed in the Political Science Department. Abstracts are generally available to the public, but PDF files are available only to current Kalamazoo College students, faculty, and staff.

Show simple item record